Apr 17 2008

Twitter and FriendFeed: The 2nd Filter

Tag: social mediaJohn Wesley @ 11:47 am

The breakthrough of Web 2.0 was the first filter. Digg, Delicious, StumbleUpon, etc. was where you went to find interesting links, filtered by (mostly) anonymous users. This was amazingly useful, but not quite as good as getting recommendations from people you know and trust.

Recently, I’ve found myself visiting these sites less and less. Not because they aren’t interesting anymore, but because a 2nd filter has popped up that’s even more useful.

Services like FriendFeed (and Twitter within that) add another layer of distillation by allowing you to track the activity of people you trust and respect.

Finding quality, relevant links just got even easier for people curious enough to take advantage of it.


Apr 16 2008

The Talent Era

Tag: entrepreneurship, musicJohn Wesley @ 12:29 pm

Today’s Lefsetz letter is sensational (subscribe):

Despite repeating the mantra that content is king, the major labels never believed this. Nor did the movie studios. Distribution is king. If you can’t find something in the store, in the theatre, it’s like it doesn’t exist. And the major labels controlled the store just like the movie studios controlled the theatres. Sure, they had to compete with each other, but there was no issue of renegades entering their domain, until the Net flattened distribution, made it available to everyone. Any act can sign up with TuneCore and get its wares on iTunes. Giving up a hell of a lot less in the process than they would if they made a deal with a major. And getting paid too, assuming they sell.

And secondary to distribution was marketing. That was the driver in the nineties. That’s what Tommy Mottola was all about. Working the media into a frenzy, driving the public into the record shops. Once again, it was a limited universe. The individual, the so-called indie, had no access to major media. Couldn’t get on the “Today Show”, never mind Top Forty radio or even MTV. Labels would pick their priorities and hype them to high heaven. They were good at this. But now they’re flummoxed, how do they reach a public that’s not paying attention?

First the strategy was street teams. Not only at the gig, but online. Thought was if you just paid enough kids, they’d spread the word on the Web. The audience is stupid, it can be influenced.

Only one problem, it can’t.

Have you visited a message board recently? The hypesters and trolls are usually outed in one post. Fake hype just doesn’t work on the Web. The culture of the Web is to out fraud. Pulling the wool over the public’s eyes is a failed strategy…

And look at the biggest success online. Google. It does essentially no hype. Google triumphed because it was good. Be good and the public will spread the word, users will flock to you, you’ll reach critical mass.

Success on the Web is predicated on quality. Sure, train-wreck value is important too, kind of like a novelty record. But those sites don’t tend to last. Unless they’re all train-wreck all the time. Then there are the MySpaces and Facebooks. Those are like new music genres. They don’t have to be executed perfectly, they just need to be new and different.

So it’s about the idea. And, ultimately, the quality of that idea. It’s not about distribution and it’s not about marketing. And the old guard doesn’t like this.

Go read the whole post. This is true of all art, not just music. I’ve got ideas and will share later.


Apr 08 2008

The Secret to a Web Sensation

Tag: entrepreneurshipJohn Wesley @ 9:58 pm

That headline was a tease. There is no secret. Just make something sensational.

What is sensational? Two components:

  • Utility. Its creates value. Something that improves people’s lives. (making someone laugh is very valuable)
  • Uniqueness. It doesn’t exist anywhere else and there are no suitable substitutes.

This first is the easy part (relatively). Find something of value and deliver it. The second is the sticking point. It’s ineffable. Some things have it, some don’t, and no one really knows why. Unfortunately banging your head against the wall for long enough won’t make it happen.

It’s magic. The charisma of a brilliant writer. The perfect blend of features and ideals that explodes into a passionate community.

Working hard at the first part is enough to earn most people a living. Finding the second part is what we all dream about.


Apr 04 2008

This guy might know a thing or two about media…

Tag: social mediaJohn Wesley @ 9:15 am

Murdoch: Technology driving vast changes in media:

Unlike traditional media, choices in the future will be generated from the bottom up, not top-down,” Murdoch explained. “A 13-year-old girl in Delhi is not going to want the same news and entertainment as a 50-year-old executive in Chicago … Our challenge is to personalize the experience for these people so we can reach them both.


Apr 01 2008

The Rise of Media Brands Online

Tag: advertisingJohn Wesley @ 12:02 pm

Great post today from John Battelle. This part gets me excited:

I believe we are at the beginning of an explosion in online media brands, akin to the explosion of consumer magazine brands in the 1940s and 50s, or the explosion of cable TV brands in the 1980s and 90s. With magazines and cable, we saw a move from a handful of major brands to hundreds of choices, all supported by major consumer marketers. With the Web, I think we can take that an order of magnitude further, or even more - from a handful (AOL, Yahoo, MSN) to thousands, or perhaps even tens of thousands.

Go read the full post.



Enter your email: